Original Research
Compliance with surgical antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines: a prospective descriptive study at a tertiary level hospital in Cape Town, South Africa
Submitted: 12 November 2025 | Published: 30 December 2020
About the author(s)
D. Schuster, Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, South AfricaJ.J. Fagan, Division of Otolaryngology, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, South Africa
M. Flint, Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, South Africa
W. Basera, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health Research, University of Cape Town, South Africa
O. Porrill, Private Practice, South Africa
J.L. Piercy, Division of Critical Care, Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, South Africa
Full Text:
PDF (83KB)Abstract
Methods: A cross-sectional prospective audit of the anaesthetic records and prescription charts of surgical patients was conducted at Groote Schuur Hospital, a tertiary level teaching hospital in Cape Town, South Africa, over a period of one week. Data were collected by anaesthetists – blinded to the study objectives – and the investigators; then captured on Excel spreadsheets and compared to existing SAP guidelines. Descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression were used for analysis.
Results: Of the 192 patients consented, 180 questionnaires were completed for data analysis. The median age of participants was 44.5 years (IQR: 31.5–58), with a preponderance of females (58.7%). SAP was administered in 149 cases (82.8%) and withheld in 31 (17.2%). This was appropriate in 91.9% (137/149) and 77.4% (24/31) respectively. Twelve patients (6.7%) received inappropriate antibiotics and in seven (3.9%) it was inappropriately withheld. Of the 156 patients who should have received SAP, choice of drug was correct in 121 (77.6%), dosage in 110 (70.5%) and timing in 87 (55.8%). Absolute compliance was achieved in 44.4% (80/180). Errors were mostly related to timing, re-dosing and duration of SAP.
Conclusion: Anaesthetists and surgeons at Groote Schuur Hospital demonstrate variable adherence to surgical antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines. Interventions aimed at improving compliance are warranted.
Keywords
Metrics
Total abstract views: 230Total article views: 36
Crossref Citations
1. Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis Used in A University Clinics Hospital and Antibiotic Costs: A 3-year Survey
Vianney N. Ntabaza, Antonelle Pardo, Amandine Nachtergael, Julien Bamps, Salvius A. Bakari, Pierre Duez, Stephanie Patris, Byanga Kahumba
Current Therapeutic Research vol: 103 first page: 100807 year: 2025
doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2025.100807
2. Knowledge and practice of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis at a tertiary academic hospital in a low-middle income country
YC Yu, C Steadman, S Chetty
Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia vol: 29 issue: 5 first page: 171 year: 2023
doi: 10.36303/SAJAA.2958
3. Perioperative antibiotic practices amongst otorhinolaryngologists (ear, nose and throat surgeons) in South Africa
M White, J McGuire, S Peer
South African Journal of Surgery vol: 62 issue: 3 first page: 254 year: 2024
doi: 10.36303/SAJS.00158
