Original Research

Essential pain management at a rural district hospital in Burundi

G. Sund, W. Morriss, K. Ikeda, A. Izere, J.C. Kwizera
Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia | Vol 26, No 5 | a938 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.36303/SAJAA.2020.26.5.2395 | © 2020 G. Sund, W. Morriss, K. Ikeda, A. Izere, J.C. Kwizera | This work is licensed under Other
Submitted: 11 November 2025 | Published: 30 October 2020

About the author(s)

G. Sund, Department of Anaesthesia and Réanimation, Hope Africa University, Burundi
W. Morriss, Department of Anaesthesia, University of Otago, Christchurch Hospital, New Zealand and World Federation of Societies of Anaesthesiologists, New Zealand
K. Ikeda, Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Virginia, United States
A. Izere, Hope Africa University, Burundi
J.C. Kwizera, Hope Africa University, Burundi

Full Text:

PDF (136KB)

Abstract

Background: Pain management is a significant challenge in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). In settings where resources are limited, interventions to improve pain management must be low-cost and context-appropriate.
Methods: At a rural district hospital in Burundi, East Africa we undertook the delivery of a simple educational workshop called Essential Pain Management (EPM) and introduction of regular acute pain rounds for post-surgical patients. At the same time, we carried out a pre- and post-intervention audit of pain management. We hypothesised that the use of the EPM educational workshop and introduction of regular acute pain rounds for post-surgical patients would lead to a reduction in patient pain scores, time to first ambulation, hospital length of stay, and changes to analgesic medication prescribing practices.
Results: We found improvements in modified visual analogue scale (VAS) scores on postoperative days one (mean VAS 42.3 vs 31.4, p < 0.001) and two (mean VAS 33.7 vs 27, p = 0.001), with no difference on day three. We also found a reduction in time to first ambulation after introduction of this service (median time of 38.8 hours vs 28 hours, p < 0.001) with no change in length of stay (median four days in both groups). There was also a marked increase in administration of analgesic medications after the service was introduced.
Conclusion: Our audit demonstrates a positive impact following a simple low-cost intervention in a rural hospital where resources are severely limited. We believe that this intervention offers a feasible and context-appropriate approach for improving postoperative pain management in a low-resource setting.

Keywords

pain; Africa; rural; low-cost; essential pain management

Metrics

Total abstract views: 169
Total article views: 30

 

Crossref Citations

1. Improving quality of surgical and anaesthesia care in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review of hospital-based quality improvement interventions
Nataliya Brima, Imran O Morhason-Bello, Vandy Charles, Justine Davies, Andy JM Leather
BMJ Open  vol: 12  issue: 10  first page: e062616  year: 2022  
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062616