Original Research

The informed consent process for anaesthesia: perspectives of elective surgical patients at Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital, Durban, South Africa

Sailuja Naidu, P.D. Gopalan
Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia | Vol 22, No 2 | a823 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/22201181.2016.1157963 | © 2016 Sailuja Naidu, P D Gopalan | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 03 November 2025 | Published: 05 May 2016

About the author(s)

Sailuja Naidu, Discipline of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
P.D. Gopalan, Discipline of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa

Full Text:

PDF (213KB)

Abstract

Background: Amongst state hospitals in the eThekwini municipality, obtaining informed consent for anaesthesia is often an informal interaction between the patient and anaesthetist, lacking structure and standardisation.
Objectives: To evaluate the informed consent process from the patients' perspective in an attempt to modify current practice.
Methods: Competent adult patients presenting for elective surgery were presented pre- and postoperatively with structured questionnaires addressing various aspects of the consent process.
Results: Of 143 included patients, only 57% of patients were given information about their anaesthetic preoperatively. With regard to complications experienced during anaesthesia, 36% of patients preferred not to be informed of any possible sequelae, while 17% wanted to be informed of all possible complications. In total, 83% of patients who had signed the surgical consent form with the surgeon thought that they had signed an anaesthetic form with the anaesthetist. Some 56% of patients felt that written consent on a specific standardised anaesthetic consent form should be introduced.
Conclusion: Even though the majority of patients are being seen preoperatively by the anaesthetist, the quality of this assessment is concerning, in terms of the amount and depth of information imparted and the lack of standardisation of information given.

Keywords

anaesthetic risk; bioethics; complications and anaesthesia; informed consent; patient and anaesthesia

Metrics

Total abstract views: 89
Total article views: 56

 

Crossref Citations

1. Perceptions, practices, and barriers in surgical informed consent: A cross-sectional study from Sudan
Ibrahim Nagmeldin Hassan, Mohamed Ibrahim, Siddig Yaqub, Muhsin Ibrahim, Haythem Abdalla, Ghada Aljaili, Wafa Osman, Nagmeldin Abuassa
Surgery in Practice and Science  vol: 23  first page: 100309  year: 2025  
doi: 10.1016/j.sipas.2025.100309

2. Appropriateness of Language Used in Patient Educational Materials from 24 National Anesthesiology Associations
Denira Govender, Alexander Villafranca, Colin Hamlin, Brett Hiebert, Divya Parveen, Eric Jacobsohn
Anesthesiology  vol: 125  issue: 6  first page: 1221  year: 2016  
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001361

3. Informed consent for peripheral nerve blocks at a tertiary level hospital in South Africa: a quality improvement project
R Burger, M Smit, U Plenge, MW Gibbs
Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia  vol: 30  issue: 2  first page: 62  year: 2024  
doi: 10.36303/SAJAA.3061

4. Prevalence of preoperative anxiety and its contributing factors in adult patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery at an academic hospital in South Africa: a pilot study
G Lamacraft, C van Rooyen, L Raubenheimer, K Arendse, X Gama, HG Jang, R Nemakundani, L Osei-Fofie
Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia  vol: 29  issue: 4  first page: 128  year: 2023  
doi: 10.36303/SAJAA.2976

5. Undesirable Postoperative Anesthesia Outcomes at Two National Referral Hospitals: A Cross-Sectional Study in Eritrea
Yonatan Mehari Andemeskel, Traudl Elsholz, Ghidey Gebreyohannes, Eyasu H. Tesfamariam
Anesthesiology Research and Practice  vol: 2020  first page: 1  year: 2020  
doi: 10.1155/2020/9792170