Research Articles

Endotracheal tube cuff pressures in adult patients undergoing general anaes- thesia in two Johannesburg academic hospitals

L. Gilliland, H. Perrie, J. Scribante
Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia | Vol 21, No 3 | a770 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/22201181.2015.1056504 | © 2015 Lizil Gilliland, Helen Perrie, Juan Scribante | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 03 November 2025 | Published: 01 January 2015

About the author(s)

L. Gilliland, Department of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa
H. Perrie, Department of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa
J. Scribante, Department of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa

Full Text:

PDF (184KB)

Abstract

Background: Endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff pressure commonly exceeds the recommended range of 20–30 cm H₂O during anaesthesia. A set volume of air will not deliver the same cuff pressure in each patient and the pressure exerted by the ETT cuff can lead to complications, with either over- or under-inflated cuffs. These can include a sore throat and cough, aspiration, volume loss during positive pressure ventilation, nerve palsies, tracheomalacia and tracheal stenosis. No objective means of ETT cuff pressure monitoring is available in the operating theatres of Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital (CMJAH) and Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital (CHBAH). The ETT cuff pressure of patients undergoing general anaesthesia is therefore unknown.
Method: ETT cuff pressure of 96 adult patients undergoing general anaesthesia without nitrous oxide at CMJAH and CHBAH was measured by one researcher. A RUSCH Endotest™ manometer was used to measure ETT cuff pressure in size 7.0 – 8.5 mm ETTs. The cuff inflation technique that was used by the anaesthetist was also documented.
Results: The mean ETT cuff pressure recorded was 47.5 cm H₂O (range 10–120 cm H₂O). ETT cuff pressures exceeded 30 cm H₂O in 64.58% of patients. Only 18.75% of patients had ETT cuff pressures within the recommended range of 20–30 cm H₂O. There was no statistically significant difference between the ETT cuff pressures measured at the two hospitals. Minimal occlusive volume was the most frequent technique used to inflate the ETT cuff (37.5%); this was followed by inflating the ETT cuff with a predetermined volume of air in 31.25% of cases and palpation of the pilot balloon (27.08%). There was no statistically significant difference between the ETT cuff pressure measured and the inflation technique used by the anaesthetist.
Conclusion: ETT cuff pressures of the majority of patients undergoing general anaesthesia at two academic hospitals were higher than the recommended range. ETT cuff pressure should routinely be measured using a manometer.

Keywords

adults; endotracheal tube cuff pressures; general anaesthesia; manometer

Metrics

Total abstract views: 196
Total article views: 85

 

Crossref Citations

1. Bi-national survey of intraoperative cuff pressure monitoring of endotracheal tubes and supraglottic airway devices in operating theatres
Julie Lee, Heather Reynolds, Anita M Pelecanos, André AJ van Zundert
Anaesthesia and Intensive Care  vol: 47  issue: 4  first page: 378  year: 2019  
doi: 10.1177/0310057X19850581

2. Effectiveness of the use of subjective techniques to achieve safe cuff pressures in artificial airway devices: a systematic review
Felipe Rosales Lillo, Giovanna Monichi Valdenegro
Revista de Investigación en Logopedia  vol: 16  issue: 1  first page: e102121  year: 2026  
doi: 10.5209/rlog.102121

3. Achieving the Recommended Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressure: A Randomized Control Study Comparing Loss of Resistance Syringe to Pilot Balloon Palpation
Fred Bulamba, Andrew Kintu, Nodreen Ayupo, Charles Kojjo, Lameck Ssemogerere, Agnes Wabule, Arthur Kwizera
Anesthesiology Research and Practice  vol: 2017  first page: 1  year: 2017  
doi: 10.1155/2017/2032748

4. Improving nurses’ knowledge of managing endotracheal tube cuff pressure in intensive care units: A quasi-experimental study
Ferestas Mpasa, Dalena R.M. van Rooyen, Danie Venter, Portia Jordan, Wilma ten Ham-Baloyi
Health SA Gesondheid  vol: 25  year: 2020  
doi: 10.4102/hsag.v25i0.1479

5. Prevalence and determinants of inappropriate endotracheal cuff pressure in adult surgical patients undergoing general anesthesia: a prospective observational study
Nuanprae Kitisin, Arada Sanggasameson, Chatwatsaya Suphasirichatthana, Chawanlak Prajongmool, Surapa Tornsatitkul, Nattaya Raykateeraroj
BMC Anesthesiology  year: 2026  
doi: 10.1186/s12871-026-03738-7

6. Management of endotracheal tube cuff pressures in the intensive care unit at a tertiary hospital: a review of the adequacy of current practices
M Meyer, C Steyl, BN Nkosi, NL Makhubela
Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia  vol: 31  issue: 4  first page: 121  year: 2025  
doi: 10.36303/SAJAA.3237

7. Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressures in the Operating Room of a Pediatric Hospital: A Quality Improvement Initiative
Kelly M. Moon, Sherry Donaworth, Molly S. Hagele, Stephani S. Kim, Brittany L. Willer, Joseph D. Tobias
Pediatric Quality & Safety  vol: 7  issue: 6  first page: e619  year: 2022  
doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000619

8. Intraoperative Cuff Pressure Measurements of Endotracheal Tubes in the Operating Theater
Julie Lee, Heather Reynolds, André van Zundert
Bali Journal of Anesthesiology  vol: 5  issue: 3  first page: 174  year: 2021  
doi: 10.4103/bjoa.bjoa_11_21

9. Comparison of the loss of resistance syringe to pilot balloon palpation in achieving the recommended endotracheal cuff pressure of Filipino patients in a tertiary private hospital: a cross-over randomized controlled trial
Jacqueline T Cua-Lim, William L Lim, Antonio H Chua
Journal of Laryngology and Voice  vol: 13  issue: 2  first page: 21  year: 2023  
doi: 10.4103/jlv.JLV_2_23