The illuminance of laryngoscopes at two central hospitals

Authors

  • G A Davies University of the Witwatersrand
  • H Perrie University of the Witwatersrand
  • J Scribante University of the Witwatersrand
  • P C Anamourlis University of the Witwatersrand

Keywords:

laryngoscope, direct laryngoscop, tracheal intubation, illumination,, mobile phone app

Abstract

Background: Direct laryngoscopy and successful endotracheal intubation require optimal illumination of laryngeal structures. The International Organization of Standardization (ISO) describes minimum adequate laryngoscope illuminance as 500 lux after 10 minutes, and further describes optimal dimensions of the illumination field. Laryngoscope light is subjectively assessed by the anaesthetist as part of theatre preparation. This study sought to describe the illumination of laryngoscopes at two academic hospitals, to compare illumination of incandescent and fibreoptic laryngoscopes and to compare the accuracy of a mobile phone application (app) to a lux meter.

Methods: A prospective, contextual, descriptive study was conducted, testing the illumination of 43 laryngoscopes with a lux meter, as well as a mobile phone app. The illumination field size of each laryngoscope was determined.

Results: ISO Standard for illumination was met by 8 (18.6%) laryngoscopes, and 11 (25.5%) had an adequate illumination field. Only 4 (9.3%) laryngoscopes met both criteria. The mobile phone app readings were significantly different from those obtained with a lux meter (p = 0.0008). After battery replacement 23 further laryngoscopes demonstrated an adequate illuminance. No significant difference was found between incandescent and fibreoptic laryngoscope illuminance (p = 0.86).

Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the available laryngoscopes had poor illuminance. A mobile phone app was not comparable to a lux meter. Routine objective illuminance testing as well as regular battery changes are suggested to be implemented.

Author Biographies

G A Davies, University of the Witwatersrand

Department of Anaesthesiology, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa 

H Perrie, University of the Witwatersrand

Department of Anaesthesiology, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

J Scribante, University of the Witwatersrand

Department of Anaesthesiology, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

P C Anamourlis, University of the Witwatersrand

Department of Anaesthesiology, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

Downloads

Published

2019-10-29

Issue

Vol. 25 No. 5 (2019)

Section

Original Research

License

By submitting manuscripts to SAJAA, authors of original articles are assigning copyright to the SA Society of Anaesthesiologists. Authors may use their own work after publication without written permission, provided they acknowledge the original source. Individuals and academic institutions may freely copy and distribute articles published in SAJAA for educational and research purposes without obtaining permission.

The work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial Works 4.0 South Africa License. The SAJAA does not hold itself responsible for statements made by the authors.