Original Research

Development and validation of a labour epidural analgesia documentation instrument for South African hospitals

Sean Chetty, Elizabeth J. Jacobs, Estie Mostert
Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia | Vol 32, No 1 | a1562 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajaa.v32i1.1562 | © 2026 Sean Chetty, Elizabeth J. Jacobs, Estie Mostert | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 07 January 2026 | Published: 04 August 2026

About the author(s)

Sean Chetty, Department of Anaesthesia, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg Department of Anaesthesiology & Critical Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
Elizabeth J. Jacobs, Department of Anaesthesia, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
Estie Mostert, Department of Anaesthesia, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

Abstract

Background: Labour epidural analgesia is the gold standard for intrapartum pain relief, yet documentation practices remain inconsistent, particularly in resource-constrained settings. Inadequate documentation creates patient-safety risk and limits audit and governance. No formally validated labour epidural documentation instrument has been described in the published literature.
Aim: This study aimed to develop and content-validate a standardised labour epidural analgesia documentation instrument for the South African health sector.
Setting: Study was conducted in the South African health sector.
Methods: A two-phase instrument development and content validation study were conducted. In the development phase, a concept instrument was generated from a literature review and refined through expert consensus. In the quantification phase, national anaesthesiology experts independently rated items for relevance and importance using a four-point Likert scale. Item-level and scale-level content validity indices and inter-rater agreement values were calculated using predefined thresholds.
Results: The initial 68-item concept instrument was refined to 56 items. Quantitative content validation resulted in a final instrument comprising four domains: pre-procedural assessment, intra-procedural documentation, post-procedural follow-up and chart layout. Most retained items demonstrated high item-level content validity (I-CVI ≥ 0.78), with inter-rater agreement values from 0.80 to 1.00. The layout domain had a borderline scale-level content validity index (S-CVI = 0.79), with all retained items meeting item-level validity criteria.
Conclusion: This study presents a content-validated labour epidural analgesia documentation instrument, defining a consensus-based minimum dataset for clinical practice.
Contribution: The findings of this research provide a foundation for patient-safety initiatives, audit, training and future electronic anaesthesia record development.


Keywords

labour epidural; clinical documentation; content validity; patient safety; obstetric anaesthesia

Sustainable Development Goal

Goal 3: Good health and well-being

Metrics

Total abstract views: 240
Total article views: 147


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.