Original Research

Quality of handover in the post-anaesthetic care unit at a quaternary children’s hospital in Cape Town, South Africa: A clinical audit

John M. Breedt, Anisa Z. Bhettay, Johan van der Walt, Sarisha Govender
Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia | Vol 32, No 1 | a1544 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajaa.v32i1.1544 | © 2026 John M. Breedt, Anisa Z. Bhettay, Johan van der Walt, Sarisha Govender | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 08 December 2025 | Published: 14 July 2026

About the author(s)

John M. Breedt, Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; and Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
Anisa Z. Bhettay, Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
Johan van der Walt, Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; and Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
Sarisha Govender, Private Practice, Cape Town, South Africa

Abstract

Background: Postoperative handover involves multidisciplinary collaboration among anaesthesia providers, surgeons and nurses, and the absence of standardised protocols can lead to communication errors that compromise patient safety. The Red Cross War Memorial Children’s Hospital (RCWMCH) lacks a standardised protocol for handover between anaesthesia providers and recovery nurses in the post-anaesthetic care unit (PACU), underscoring the need to evaluate current practices.
Aim: To evaluate the quality of postoperative handover between anaesthetists and recovery nurses in the PACU using a standardised checklist.
Setting: The PACU of the RCWMCH, a quaternary academic children’s hospital in Cape Town, South Africa.
Methods: This was a cross-sectional observational study conducted in the PACU at the RCWMCH. A Paediatric Anaesthesia Handover Checklist was used to evaluate current handover practices. The checklist consisted of 26 mandatory items requiring verbal handover. Based on each item handed over, a score was calculated out of 26, and this was expressed as a percentage.
Results: Fifty-five handovers were observed, involving 20 anaesthetists. The average duration of handover was 54.23 s. Handovers were frequently incomplete, with scores ranging from 0 out of 26 to 17 out of 26 (65.38%), and an average score of 5.54 out of 26 (21.31%). The most commonly handed-over item was intraoperative analgesia 42 out of 55 (76.36%). Despite routine administration, use of sedative premedication was reported in only 26 out of 55 (47.27%) of cases.
Conclusion: The quality of handover in the PACU at the RCWMCH was low. Critical patient safety information was frequently omitted, highlighting the need for intervention. The use of checklists may improve the quality of communication and prevent potential adverse events.
Contribution: This audit demonstrates significant gaps in paediatric PACU handover in a resource-limited setting and supports the introduction of a structured handover checklist as a low-cost intervention to improve communication and patient safety.


Keywords

paediatric anaesthesia; post anaesthesia care unit; postoperative complications; handover checklist; interdisciplinary communication; patient safety.

Sustainable Development Goal

Goal 3: Good health and well-being

Metrics

Total abstract views: 364
Total article views: 314


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.