Original Research

Pre-operative anxiety and the effect of soft toys in children at an academic hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa

Katherine R. Drennan, Grace Manjooran, Cara Redelinghuys
Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia | Vol 32, No 1 | a1522 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajaa.v32i1.1522 | © 2026 Katherine R. Drennan, Grace Manjooran, Cara Redelinghuys | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 02 December 2025 | Published: 22 July 2026

About the author(s)

Katherine R. Drennan, Department of Anaesthesia, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
Grace Manjooran, Department of Anaesthesia, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
Cara Redelinghuys, Department of Anaesthesia, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

Abstract

Background: Paediatric pre-operative anxiety is common. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods can reduce pre-operative anxiety. Low- and middle-income countries require safe, affordable, accessible methods such as soft toys to minimise anxiety.
Aim: This study aimed to describe pre-operative anxiety in children and the effect of soft toys in managing anxiety.
Setting: The study involved children ages 2–17 years receiving general anaesthesia for elective surgery at a South African academic hospital.
Methods: This prospective, cross-sectional observational study assessed 114 children using the modified Yale Pre-operative Anxiety Scale (mYPAS) at three points: Waiting area (T1); after being offered a soft toy (T2); and at mask introduction (T3). Scores of 30 or greater indicated high anxiety.
Results: At baseline, 54% of children displayed high anxiety (T1 median mYPAS = 30). Those who refused a toy were more anxious than those who accepted a toy (median mYPAS = 37 vs 30; p = 0.10). Anxiety decreased after toy introduction (T2 median mYPAS = 28) with significantly lower scores in children who chose a toy (p = 0.006). Anxiety spiked at mask introduction (T3 median mYPAS = 41) with 93% showing high anxiety regardless of toy presence (p = 0.63). Toys were associated with lower anxiety at T2 (p = 0.039) but not at T3 (p = 0.61). Older age correlated with lower anxiety at T3 only (p < 0.001). Caregiver presence approached statistical significance at T3 (p = 0.054).
Conclusion: Soft toys help reduce anxiety initially, but not during mask introduction. Combining low-cost, non-pharmacological strategies may improve outcomes in resource-limited settings.
Contribution: Soft toys are safe, affordable, and accessible for peri-operative anxiolysis in low- and middle-income countries.


Keywords

pre-operative period; anxiety; paediatrics; toys; non-pharmacological

Sustainable Development Goal

Goal 3: Good health and well-being

Metrics

Total abstract views: 296
Total article views: 202


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.