Original Research

Comparison of a ketamine-propofol combination and etomidate for anaesthesia induction on haemodynamic parameters in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting

A. Luna, A. Gupta, S. Aggarwal
Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia | Vol 28, No 4 | a1186 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.36303/SAJAA.2022.28.4.2728 | © 2022 A. Luna, A. Gupta, S. Aggarwal | This work is licensed under Other
Submitted: 19 November 2025 | Published: 01 September 2022

About the author(s)

A. Luna, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, India
A. Gupta, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, India
S. Aggarwal, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, India

Full Text:

PDF (78KB)

Abstract


Objective: To compare the haemodynamic response of both a ketamine-propofol (ketofol) combination and etomidate for anaesthesia induction in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).


Methods: This randomised study was conducted in 120 patients (n = 60 for each group) who were scheduled for elective CABG surgery. Patients in group K received ketofol (a ketamine and propofol combination [1:1]) and group E received etomidate, until loss of verbal response. Baseline haemodynamic variables including heart rate (HR), systolic arterial pressure (SAP), diastolic arterial pressure (DAP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), cardiac output (CO), cardiac index (CI) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) were measured for all patients at 1, 2 and 3 minutes post induction. Serum cortisol and blood sugar levels were also compared before induction, after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and at 24 hours postoperatively.


Results: Statistically significant reduction occurred in HR, SAP, DAP and MAP from baseline until 3 minutes post induction in both groups (p < 0.001), but intergroup comparison was comparable. Maximum fall in CO and CI from baseline at 3 minutes were greater in group E than in group K (38.18% and 22.36%, and 34.16% and 19.86%, respectively). Maximum fall in SVR at 3 minutes post induction was greater in group K than in group E and was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Significant increase in cortisol levels occurred within group K from baseline until 24 hours postoperatively. Significant fall in serum cortisol levels occurred after weaning off CPB within group E, which returned to almost baseline at 24 hours. Blood glucose levels rose from baseline until 24 hours postoperatively in both groups, but peaked more in group K after weaning from CPB than in group E (p < 0.05).


Conclusion: We concluded that both ketofol and etomidate produced stable haemodynamics in patients undergoing CABG.



Keywords

Ketamine-propofol combination; etomidate; cardiopulmonary bypass; haemodynamic response; cardiac anaesthesia

Metrics

Total abstract views: 228
Total article views: 39

 

Crossref Citations

1. Use of Ketamine, Propofol and Their Combination (KETOFOL) For Procedural Sedation in Emergency Department: A Review
Huma Nasir, Muhammad Arslan Zahid, Muhammad Saleh, Shafique Ahmed, Reeba Wirk, Bahram Khan
Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences  first page: 05  year: 2023  
doi: 10.54393/pjhs.v4i02.539

2. Comparison of hemodynamic stability of propofol ketamine versus etomidate ketamine during induction in peritonitis cases posted for emergency surgery
Dadi Suneetha, Nimmagadda Rajaratnakumar, Sunkesula Bharat Kumar, Krishna Saketh Athmakuri, Syeda Farozan Quadri, Shalmala Vani
EUREKA: Health Sciences  issue: 2  first page: 33  year: 2023  
doi: 10.21303/2504-5679.2023.002914

3. Etomidate vs Ketamine-Propofol for Induction of Anesthesia in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Nicolas Kumar, Amit Bardia, Michael G. Fitzsimons, Michael Essandoh, Justin Mitchell, Samuel R. Falkson, Adam Dalia, Jonathan Tang, Tamara R. Sawyer, Manoj H. Iyer
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia  vol: 29  issue: 4  first page: 246  year: 2025  
doi: 10.1177/10892532251332079