Original Research

What should I tell my patient? Disclosure in anaesthesiology: difficulties, requirements, guidelines and suggestions

Malcolm de Roubaix
Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia | Vol 24, No 1 | a1093 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/22201181.2018.1432252 | © 2018 Malcolm de Roubaix | This work is licensed under Other
Submitted: 17 November 2025 | Published: 28 February 2018

About the author(s)

Malcolm de Roubaix, Centre for Applied Ethics, Department of Philosophy, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa

Full Text:

PDF (145KB)

Abstract

South African anaesthesiologists have embraced the requirement for authentic informed consent, but there is no consensus regarding the comprehensiveness and specificity requirements with regard to the information that needs to be supplied to the patient, and upon which decisions will be based. Anaesthesiology is an unusual specialty. The scope of knowledge and expertise that practitioners require is wide-ranging, from the basic and applied biomedical sciences and technology, clinical knowledge and experience, through to hands-on operating room experience and expertise, feeding into the requirement to inform. Contemporary practice environments limit contact time with patients. Societal ethos demands recognition of basic human rights, amongst others the right to personal autonomy. The South African Health Professions Council has published a series of booklets describing guidelines to ethical medical practice, one of which is on informed consent. This article discusses the information requirements for valid informed consent from both a moral and regulatory perspective. The practical implications for anaesthesiologists of the HPCSA guidelines on informed consent are discussed, a model interview is proposed, and a number of illustrative cases are discussed. The aim is to answer the question: What should I as anaesthesiologist tell my patient?

Keywords

disclosure standards; informed consent in anaesthesiology; moral requirements of informed consent; patient autonomy; regulatory requirements for informed consent

Metrics

Total abstract views: 175
Total article views: 47

 

Crossref Citations

1. Development of a Clinical Prediction Model for In‐hospital Mortality from the South African Cohort of the African Surgical Outcomes Study
Hyla‐Louise Kluyts, Wilhelmina Conradie, Estie Cloete, Sandra Spijkerman, Oliver Smith, Ahmed Alli, Modise Z. Koto, Odisang D. Montwedi, Komalan Govender, Larissa Cronjé, Mariette Grobbelaar, Jones A. Omoshoro‐Jones, Nicolette F. Rorke, Philip Anderson, Alexandra Torborg, Christella Alphonsus, Panagiotis Alexandris, Aunel Mallier Peter, Usha Singh, Johan Diedericks, Busisiwe Mrara, Anthony Reed, Gareth L. Davies, Jody G. Davids, Hendrik A. Van Zyl, Vishendran Govindasamy, Reitze Rodseth, Roel Matos‐Puig, Kajake A. P. Bhat, Noel Naidoo, John Roos, Magdalena Jaworska, Annemarie Steyn, Johannes M. Dippenaar, R. M. Pearse, Thandinkosi Madiba, Bruce M. Biccard
World Journal of Surgery  vol: 45  issue: 2  first page: 404  year: 2021  
doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05843-1

2. Preanaesthetic assessment and management in the context of the district hospital
Olufemi B. Omole, Michelle Torlutter, Agetta J. Akii
South African Family Practice  vol: 63  issue: 1  year: 2021  
doi: 10.4102/safp.v63i1.5357